Throughline

Guidance ledger · Q4 FY26

Deepak Nitrite Ltd DEEPAKNTR

4 revisions on record · 3 lowered · 0 raised — the strikethrough is what management used to say

directional guidance only · shifted across quarters
↓ lowered MIBK/MIBC commissioning timeline Q1 FY26 → Q4 FY26
H2FY26 (Q1FY26)tail end of Q1FY27 or early Q2FY27
“tail end of Q1 or the early part of Q2 is when we will be looking at commissioning of the asset”
↓ lowered Nitric acid utilization Q1 FY26 → Q4 FY26
100%+ from Q3FY26 onwards (Q1FY26)45% in Q4FY26 due to technical issues
“during this quarter under review, we were roughly at about 45% of”
→ narrowed AI segment EBIT margin trajectory Q1 FY26 → Q4 FY26
double-digit EBIT margins maybe sometime next year (Q1FY26)stronger margin profile in FY27 vs FY26; Q1FY27 better than Q4FY26
“a stronger margin profile, even for the standalone business, compared with FY2 6”
↓ lowered Polycarbonate commissioning Q2 FY26 → Q4 FY26
by March 2028 (Q2FY26)by June 2028
“are expecting it to be commissioned by June 2028.”

Method. Revisions come from management's own stated numbers, compared quarter over quarter across the covered concalls; each carries the verbatim quote. “No revisions” can also mean guidance too vague to pin down — see the posture chip above. Not investment advice.