IRFC pivoted from single-client railway NBFC to government-ecosystem lender: Q1FY26 NIM jumped 1.31 to 1.51 as diversification fired.
- Roa differential between new — answer hedged.
- Aum growth guidance number — answer hedged.
Adjusting for tax benefits and provisioning requirements, what will ROA be for the new vs old business?
New business is currently ~5% of total AUM of INR4.85 lakh crores. ROA has come from 1.34% to 1.39%. Management target is 60-40 mix (60% railways cost-plus, 40% diversified). The company will remain tax-free for next 5 to 7 years due to accumulated depreciation from leasing. The analyst's calculation of ~2% ROA for the new business based on 2.25-2.5% NIM, 0.25% operating cost, 0.5% provisioning with no tax is reasonable but management cannot officially validate the numbers.
Any guidance on AUM growth number — INR5 lakh crore target sounds too conservative at only 3%?
The guidance is to grow every indicator — top line, bottom line, EPS, NIM — by double digit. Without AUM growth, none of that is possible. The team target is simple: grow every indicator by 10% and they will internally calculate the required AUM. No specific AUM growth number is given.
What are the sanction numbers at end of FY26 and what does the pipeline look like going ahead? Also what can be expected disbursements for FY27?
We started with zero pipeline or a very small pipeline of INR3,500 crores. This year, we sanctioned nearly INR74,000 crores of assets in FY26 and disbursement stands at nearly INR35,000 crores. Key deals include DFCCIL World Bank refinancing of ~INR10,000 crores and HURL refinancing of ~INR12,000 crores. Going ahead in FY27, sanctions should be more than INR75,000 crores and the INR35,000 crore disbursement mark will again be breached. Margins on new business are over 100 bps versus the 35-40 bps from railways, making INR35,000 crores equivalent to nearly INR1 lakh crores in yield terms.
On incremental NIM — what rates are being offered versus competition in the new business?
We are always looking for the best class of assets. For highly-rated A, A+, AA, AAA assets, margins are in tune of 100 bps to 120 bps. We compete with NBFCs and banks and are winning more than 60% of bids. Despite competition in a crowded space, our zero NPA helps attract cheaper borrowing and we can offer better rates while maintaining NIM.
Our MoA is to disburse to railways and its ecosystem. How is the fertilizer sector disbursement correlated to the core sector?
Under our mandate, anything with backward or forward linkage to railways can be funded. Fertilizer companies have railway sidings and use railways for evacuation of finished goods and raw materials. HURL (promoted by NTPC, IOCL, Coal India) and the Talcher project (promoted by GAIL and Coal India) both qualify. This is the sweet spot — backward and forward linkages mean almost all infrastructure qualifies.
Targeting 60-40 mix in 3-4 years, even with 5% AUM growth, would need almost INR1 lakh crores disbursement per year. Is that possible?
Railways repay around INR20,000 crores per year, so net disbursement requirement is ~INR40,000 crores as the base. The company aspires to 30-40% non-railway mix. With competitive rates, zero NPA status, and low overheads, business is coming to IRFC without needing to market itself. There is already an NTPC-UP government RFP of INR28,000-29,000 crores in the public domain where IRFC could pick up ~INR16,000-17,000 crores based on single-entity exposure limits.
What repayment rate from existing railway contracts and how should we look at AUM growth for the next couple of years?
Repayments from railways are around INR20,000 crores per year going forward. The target is to cross INR5 lakh crores in FY27 and maintain it steady. The key message is that even with steady AUM, replacing lower-margin railway business with higher-margin diversification will grow NIM, PAT, and EPS. The internal team target is to grow every indicator by 10%.
What is the NIM differential between new and old business and where do you expect NIM to be in FY27?
Old railways margins were 40 bps; new business targets 100-120 bps. NIM moved from 1.42% to 1.50% for FY26, nearly 6% up. Target for FY27 is NIM growth of minimum 10%, landing at about 1.65% by year-end.
Clarification — tax-free status applies equally to non-railway business?
Yes. The company will remain tax-free for next 5 years based on already accumulated depreciation. Additionally, IRFC will be getting more leasing business not just from Indian Railways but also for metros and rapid rail. PBT and PAT will remain the same for a considerable period.
How is IRFC preparing to capture future opportunities in railway infrastructure financing given challenges of rising capital requirements, interest rate volatility, and regulatory oversight?
In the last 1.5 years major milestones have been covered and in last 1 year sanctions crossed INR74,000 crores. Good inquiries are coming from power, thermal, railway (new corridors requiring INR2.5 lakh crores, 7 high-speed rail requiring INR16 lakh crores), renewable, road, and port sectors. Net worth stands at INR56,000 crores with only INR35,000 crores disbursed so exposure norms are fully open — a good cushion for future growth. Lending rates are aligned with market and revised based on market conditions.
How will IRFC's funding strategy evolve — liquidity, diversification of funding sources, and capital structure alignment?
IRFC remains sole financing arm for Ministry of Railways and will fund any extra budgetary requirements. For high-speed rail corridors (7 announced) and DFC (Dankuni to Surat), IRFC has first right. ECB loans are being done back-to-back — $300M, $400M, and a $1.1B bid now open, all in yen. Road shows conducted in Japan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. ECB contribution target is 30-35% of total kitty. 54EC long-term capital gain bond market share reached 28% last year and targets higher this year at 5.25% coupon. Zero coupon bond was successfully done, first in the country. Overall borrowing cost target is below G-Sec rate.
PAT dropped from INR1,800 crores in Q3 to INR1,684 crores in Q4, and OCI also declined — can you explain?
Total revenue declined due to lower other income — Q3 had a tax refund with interest that is absent in Q4. Additional CSR provisions were made in Q4. The OCI movement is mark-to-market on hedged foreign currency borrowings for non-MoR business; these are temporary postings per Ind AS 109 cash flow hedge accounting and will reverse and be reclassified through P&L when actual exchange flows occur. They will not be passed to MoR.
For non-railway CPSE exposure with foreign currency borrowing, who bears the currency risk — IRFC or is it passed on?
For non-railway business, if ECB is mixed in, the risk lies with IRFC and it is immediately hedged. Hedging limits are conservative in both yen and dollar. Cost including hedging for ECB raised for non-railway consumption is below 6%, which is attractive. IRFC is also creating a cost-plus model for metro railways where risk will be passed on to them. So two models exist: cost-plus and open-RFP with risk borne by IRFC.
What safeguards exist to maintain zero NPA status now that IRFC has exposure beyond Ministry of Railways?
Clients are cherry-picked from Navratna and Maharatna CPSEs — NTPC, GAIL, Coal India, IOCL, DFCCIL, CONCOR, RVNL SPVs. For state governments, only GenCos and TransCos are targeted; DISCOMs are completely avoided. States chosen include MAHAGENCO, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, and a 50-50 JV with NTPC and UP Government. All selected assets have strong balance sheets, PPA arrangements in place, and cost-plus models. Zero NPA is a business proposition — it keeps borrowing costs the lowest, not just a status symbol.