ARV guidance upgraded from INR2,500 cr to INR2,800 cr.
- Cdmo sustainable base — answer hedged.
- Specialized modalities opex drag — answer hedged.
- Roce 25 timing — answer hedged.
CDMO grew 88% in H1 FY'26 but Q3 grew only 7.5% sequentially. Is the lumpiness entering a plateau? Is Q3 the new sustainable quarterly base for CDMO?
See, CDMO revenues if you look at the overall year nine months we have grown significantly and we are also confident that the growth will continue like although the Q3 was a little softer because of timing of deliveries to our partners but we expect, if you look at Q4FY'25 versus Q4FY'26 we expect to grow. Request you to take annual revenue then quarter-on-quarter for the CDMO.
Could you quantify the quarterly EBITDA drag from specialized modalities like CGT and ADC? Is the INR 250 crore budget still sufficient?
None of this pre-operative expenditure on any of our new initiatives is capitalized. So, every new modality expenditure is expensed. So, in the ADC space we are investing significantly both in OPEX and CAPEX but we are not capitalizing it.
On ROCE/ROE guidance - with the Rs 5,000 crore Vizag complex and current 0.9 asset turn, aren't we risking another multi-year period of operating deleverage? Will we hit 25% ROCE target in next 12 months?
I think in case of bio, our revenues will stagnate until we operationalize our new capacity which will be by end of this calendar year and we are not committing that will achieve a ROCE of 25% in the next 12 months but we are confident that the ROCE percentage will go up from the current 18%. Right now it is 18.5% ROCE. We expect to go up, but we are not committing it will go to 25, with a time bound program.
CDMO sequentially down 13% YOY up 1%. Despite late-stage and commercial supplies we are seeing flattening. Any call-out? How to look at FY27 CDMO?
Yes, even while the late-stage supplies and also commercial supplies are ongoing, even in such situations, some of these supplies are once or twice per year, in some cases. So, there's not necessarily a supply going out every month. It comes down to their internal manufacturing capacity and demand requirements. So, even in the case of it going commercial, we will continue to expect lumpiness in some of the programs. While we are not giving any concrete numbers for '27, we still expect a healthy growth over whatever we expect to report in '26. Majority of FY'27 revenues in our CDMO division will be commercial supplies and I think that much I can make a statement.
How do you see animal health and agrochemical/crop science scale-up in FY'27? Any large contract in pipeline with big pharma?
On the animal health, there's ongoing commercial supplies for a few compounds continue to do validations and filings for our partners in other programs. So, there is some meaningful revenue for this year as well and that we expect to continue or in fact grow on that. In the crop science space, we have commercialized one particular supplies for our partner and we expect that to continue shipments in the coming years as well but we look forward to adding more partners in the crop science space but meaningful revenues for the crop science probably will start maybe two years or 1 to 2 years down the road. And on your second question on the large commercial contracts, I mean unfortunately I can't necessarily comment on that, but we continue to have good discussions with several partners in several phases of the programs.
Are there cases where innovator large pharma is looking to move late stage molecules from other clients to us?
The opportunity exist but unfortunately without divulging confidential information I can't really fully comment on that, so yes.
Significant wave of demand coming to India on small molecule from innovators. How is Laurus prepared? Are current capacities sufficient? Considering freeing up generic capacities and allocating to CDMO?
I think one of the strategies that we have adopted is, investing ahead of time and that was the case over the last couple of years where we continue to do significant amount of CAPEX. That was in line with what we were expecting from capacity requirements and customer additions and therefore that has positioned strongly to meet some of these new opportunities that are coming about and that's also in line with our current guidance on CAPEX for this year and the next year this is to create capacities for our partners and opportunities that we are seeing.
Related to peptides - how much investment over next couple of years and when will revenues start? Do you have contracts/talks with big pharma or are you creating capacity first?
I think we will give more details at the appropriate time, Vivek, on this. But what I can give you a glimpse. We are creating capacity for a fully integrated programs, protected amino acids and natural amino acids, fragments, final peptide and purification and isolation. So, the capacity being created is fully integrated. And we will give you both details at an appropriate time. I think I can't give you more details on this.
Why was there only marginal growth in CDMO business quarter-on-quarter compared to generic business?
If your question is why CDMO revenues are not growing, as we indicated, you can't compare in a quarter-on-quarter for a CDMO revenue. You have to see on a year basis. So, for 9-months as Dr. Satya said we already achieved a 50% growth. For a year also we expecting to have a higher growth.
What will be the total TAM of the market in the OLED segment in FY27-28?
It's still an emerging development, given that the partner program that we are working on is also a developmental program. So, I can't necessarily comment on the market size itself because that's an emerging space that's currently under development.
On generic API and FDF - how sustainable is the volume ramp-up given API/FDF has fluctuated over last 24-36 months?
The growth in generic API business would be very sustainable and when it comes to growth in our other FDF business, will also eventually sustainable despite up and down in few quarters because increased capacity for our CMO business in Europe with European customer will yield revenues starting from this quarter and fully operational by next quarter. So, we expect those numbers are also sustainable in the long run, may not be in Q4 this year and Q1 next year but eventually we expect to do well there as well.
On peptides timelines - 24/36/48 months? What is the timeline given billions invested?
I think you have to have bear with us for some more time. We will give you the details at appropriate time. But as you mentioned we are investing significant amount in peptides as well as also significant amount in ADCs.
What is the exchange benefit for this quarter because of the dollar movement?
Yes, but not very significant.
On CDMO partner conversations - what has been the change in quality, scale and scope of discussions?
It's a long answer, but to just summarize that, I think the tone of the conversations continue to remain same in terms of what kind of capacities, capabilities and credentials that the Company has, I think that's what primarily attracts our customers. With that being said, I think the global landscape has been a tailwind for potential conversations with customers, but the fundamentals need to be sound and that will only drive the businesses, our understanding is this.
Many CDMO players talk about peptides as $10 billion opportunity. How much will come to India and what kind of market share for Laurus in 3-5 years?
It's a very difficult question to answer see we don't have visibility on who is investing what capacity what products they have, but whoever gets the GLP opportunity people are investing in amino acids product, amino acids, fragments and some of them investing in small volume some of the investing large volume, opportunity is going to be meaningful for good number of players and I will not be in a position to comment any further on this.
Could you break down ARV sales into formulations and API for the quarter and 9 months?
In the 9 months, the formulation is Rs. 865 crores ARV. And the API is Rs. 1,259 crores. Total ARV revenues were Rs. 744 crores for Quarter 3.
On the CAPEX side, how much investment into peptides and ADC for the next 12-24 months, and overall CAPEX for FY27?
ADC is still at the nascent stage right now. We have allocated $25 million to the GMP facility which is under construction right now. We don't expect any meaningful revenues coming from ADCs in the next two years. When it comes to CDMO investment in peptide commercial manufacturing facilities, we expect qualification during this calendar year and we will give you more details as and when we are in position to give feedback to you. The overall CAPEX this year will be about Rs. 1,000 crores and FY'26 based on the current estimate, we do feel it will be over Rs. 1,000 crores next year also.
On the pecking order of gross margin across API synthesis and FDF segments?
Tushar, the order remains same. CDMO, formulation, API. This is in order. Yes, API on the lower side, formulation on the higher side and CDMO is on the top. We expect to maintain gross margins of around 60% for the coming quarter and also next financial year.
Operating cash flow up 600% in 9 months, conversion at 113% vs 10-year 63%. Can you help us understand longer-term sustainable EBITDA-to-OCF conversion?
Sajalji, thanks for your very interesting question. So, this kind of a help happened because of some of the customer advances which helped this year, number one. But, of course, if you look at the absolute number of the NWC is close to the similar number for the March and December, but the revenue has increased, that's really helped. But you are right, from 63% to 80%-90%, but beyond that actually some part has helped through its customer advances.
What is one area where Laurus has chosen NOT to grow despite the opportunity looking interesting?
Very thought provoking question you asked Sajalji. Right now, we decide not to enter into large-scale MAB manufacturing, we don't want to do that. That's the area we decide not to get in. And the other area we decide not to enter right now is also sterile manufacturing. These two areas we decide not to enter, although opportunities looks good but we also need to understand our management bandwidth to handle many things.
Can you elaborate on the joint venture with Krka Pharma?
The joint venture with the Krka Pharma is to manufacture formulations for European market where APIs will be supplied by us and in the Phase-1, we are creating 3 billion solid oral capacity and 100 million solid oral capacity for potent molecules. In the Phase-2, we will create another 5 billion tablet capacity in the solid oral space. Phase-1 we expect to complete by mid of 2027. This unit will primarily will do formulations packaging for various European markets and also some markets in Asia Pacific as well.
On cell and gene therapy update - what revenues will kick in and what are we trying to achieve?
In the cell therapy, our associate company ImmunoACT is already having commercial revenues and when it comes to gene therapy, we are at very initial stage of investments in antibody drug conjugates and gene therapy. Our process development labs were operationalized and the GMP facilities will come in the next 12 months and we don't expect any revenues from ADCs and gene therapy at least in the next 24 months.
For CDMO as well as API and FDF business - is there anything to call out with respect to volume and pricing, especially in API and FDF? Have you benefited on pricing?
The API, FDF we predominantly benefited from the volume gain. Pricing hasn't played a significant role in this the volume gain was significant.
Has currency played any role in your gross margin improvement sequentially given USD-INR movement?
Answer is yes but not very significant. Definitely we will get a benefit because we are a net exporter, but I am saying that it is not a very significant impact or positive impact.
On ImmunoACT, you tied up with Cipla for South Africa. Any comment on that market?
That opportunity will be meaningful only a year from now because of the regulatory approval needed in South Africa. So, clinical trials will start soon in South Africa. So, in FY'28 you will see that. But there are some milestones even already received from Cipla.
Regarding the new greenfield CAPEX of 500 acres in Atchutapuram, when can we expect Phase-1 online? FY'28?
We are expecting the land allotment and handover will happen in the Q4 this year, financial year. And CAPEX will start from maybe second part of FY'27 and we expect to qualification and validations only two years from now.
On generics - 3 billion tablet capacity has come online in Unit II for Krka. When do we expect to generate revenue from this new capacity?
We have already started using the additional capacity and we will see a little bit of increase or jump from next financial year Q1.
On CDMO Q4 growth YOY - will it come from new commercial molecule supply or late-stage? In CY2026, how many new commercial molecules will you supply?
Most of the revenue in Q4 is going to come from commercial supplies of molecules what we supplied earlier. So, in the last 18 months, I can give you because we did had a review internally, so we supplied three commercial NCEs in the last 18 months.
On generics - significant step up in Q3, what is the sustainability and how to look at FY'27?
In the generic space, lion's share of revenues are coming from ARV with both APIs and formulations and that business is pretty stable. Actually, we are able to increase our market share in both API and formulations and our North American formulation and European CMO sales also going up. I think we believe those numbers what we did in Q3 are sustainable.
On the MoU signed with LORDIN South Korea where you announced entry into OLED materials - how does LORDIN enter this structure apart from pharma?
So, similar to our strategy across different areas right like for example human health, animal health and crop science, OLED represents another potential opportunity where we could be a potential player in the OLED materials which are again small molecules or chemically synthesized compounds, right? That is an MoU that we had agreed upon with LORDIN and we don't necessarily expect to see any meaningful revenues this year or the next, but that gives us an opportunity to potentially play in this very lucrative market.
Last year Q4 had other income of ~Rs 40-50 crores leading to higher profitability. Was this a one-off or can we expect similar in this Q4?
We are not expecting Other income in the Quarter 4. Yes, that was a one-off for last year.
What is the current asset turnover?
0.91 actually.
Are you trying to move from being an API or CDMO sector to a biotech company - is that the longer-term vision?
No, see our investments in biotech, for example, cell therapy, gene therapy, ADCs are most emerging fields globally and we wanted to invest ahead of the curve and wet our hands to capture opportunities. In the case of peptides and all we are well established, we have investment, we have programs running right now. So, answer to your question is, we are more focused on large volume CDMO, right now.
How big and long is the CDMO opportunity? Many Indian pharma players are expanding here - what is Laurus's competitive advantage?
I don't say we have an advantage, we were well prepared to take the opportunity. I will put it that way. So, people look at us, if there is a complex chemistry, if there is a scale involved, if it is a flow chemistry, if it is biocatalysis, if it's high energy chemistry and involves scale and we are the perfect partners. So, we have invested in these modalities and created capacities.
On 50% CDMO share target - is that a ceiling or will we look beyond breaching 50%?
I think our first goal is to reach 50%. It's not going to be there in the medium term, it is a long-term goal for us to get there.
On ARVs - you earlier guided stabilization around 2,400-2,500 crores. We seem to be running ahead. Has something changed? Is it sustainable?
See, earlier we guided 2,500 plus or minus 200 crores. But you're right, current run rate is a little beyond that. The main contributor for that is, we have expanded our API capacities to meet our customer demand that is driving our positive growth there and now if I have to restate that currently we are at 2,600 plus or minus 200, I will put it that way. But fundamentally hasn't changed much.
Has the profitability of ARV improved versus the dip a couple of years back? Any change in competitive intensity?
It's profitable if we sweat assets more, that's what we are doing right now. Nitin, actually what happened, actually we suffered for a few quarters because of the steep price reduction but that we could able to recover those things like because of some process improvements, raw material prices and productivity improvements. As we have been indicating for the last 6 quarters that we have been working on ARVs that is being resulted in this quarter.
On non-ARV formulation business - what are the growth drivers for next 12-18 months? Run rate from here?
We expect to sustain those because of additional capacities coming up for our CMO partner in Europe and also volume gain in US and also some new launches in North America both the US and Canada. I think we expect little lumpiness but it is not significant.
On CDMO human health - is there still a human health CDMO contract on track? And on crop science - is the commercial product patented?
In the human health space there are several different programs that we currently working with several partners and as Dr. Satya mentioned there's several commercial supplies ongoing in the human health. Our largest share of CDMO is in the human health space by far and that will continue to be the case. After that we have a sizable portion coming in from animal health and the third one which is again currently very small is in the crop science space. The commercial one is technically a product and some of the other opportunities that we are working on are also on the patented ones that we are looking at.
If ARV will be Rs 2,500-3,000 crores, what is the expected growth in generic API and formulations in next 2-3 years?
We will grow in the next year but significant growth will come in FY'28 because we are having capacities and we are validating some generic APIs and formulations. So, growth will be significant in FY'28 but there will be some growth in FY'27 as well, the generic API as well as the FDF space.
If asset turnover is 0.9, what is the maximum achievable fixed asset turnover ratio?
If you look at one of our slide in the investor presentation, our 5-year average asset turn was 1.1. maybe 0.9 to 1.1 we will reach, but our peak asset turn was 1.4. We are not anticipating 1.4 at this moment but we are targeting 1.1 over a period of time. The 0.9 to 1.1 actually we can do.