Throughline · holding view Deep analysis Q4 FY26
AMBUJACEM Ambuja Cements Ltd · Cement Q4 FY26 · concall
Pattern: fy27 volume guidance capacity

Cost staircase reset to INR4,500 peak and INR250/yr glide.

2 deflections · 4 weak · 12 clean pushback across 6 of 18 Q&A turns

Focused evidence 6 of 18

Navin Sahadeo · ICICI Securitiesweak

Volumes ex-Orient were flattish Y-o-Y for the March quarter but FY27 guidance is 80 MT (9-10% growth) against industry growth of 5%. How do we reconcile? Also, will the timeline to 140-155 MT capacity reset?

For FY '27, the 80 million indication (around 8%) is supported by stabilizing acquired Sanghi/Penna, the ongoing expansions getting commissioned between now and September, and 10 million tonnes of incremental capacity. Primary focus remains organic in terms of stabilizing ongoing expansions and already acquired assets. The target plans of FY '28 could move a year or 2, on a safer side FY '30. But what matters is ramping up volume from existing assets - even hitting 120 million tonnes by end of '27 gives good leverage on market opportunity.

Manish Somaiya · Cantorweak

How much of the FY27 improvement is dependent on internal execution versus external normalization? And what's a realistic premium-share target beyond 35-36%?

Vinod: External factors affect everyone; weighting more on internal execution and differentiation. Karan: Whatever guidance we are giving is 100% controllable by us; if we don't achieve it, it's purely internal execution. The whole team is hyper focused and we are very confident on delivering. Vinod: 36% premium share is a good number to sustain as a percentage of trade sales.

Amber Singhania · Nippon India AMCweak

Last call (first week of February) commentary was December exit well below INR4,000 and Q4 commentary INR4,500 with one-offs. With better seasonality, premiumization and pricing in Q4, plus typical inventory carry, how does the math work to a INR4,500 average and only INR4,100 March exit?

In December we were upbeat on Penna turnarounds, but Penna is South-skewed and South was the most affected geography for March quarter; took machines on shutdown plus a couple of breakdowns - higher R&M. Higher sales/branding spend. Abnormal packing bag costs in March, higher fuel cost and consumption. December quarter was also INR4,500; March INR4,500. Commentary was always about exit month of March getting closer to INR4,000, not the average. Could not come below INR4,500 for Q4.

Pulkit Patni · Goldman Sachsdeflection

How important is Naliya railway line for Sanghi (currently 57% utilization)? And on JP assets, will those come to us given our own organic ramp-up to do, or could we pass?

Sanghi base model is not linked to Naliya railway line - it's marine infra-driven, with 7 vessels ordered for progressive delivery starting next year, plus road movement. Railway is an add-on, not in base model. Ramp-up applies to existing capacity utilization, not capacity expansion. JP - the RP is another listed company, inappropriate to comment from my side; as developments happen, we'll come to know.

Pinakin · HSBCdeflection

Ambuja's EBITDA per tonne is the lowest among first four reporters with high cost inflation. Will industry/company raise prices to pass through? And can you give EBITDA per tonne guidance for FY28 given building blocks of cost/price/turnaround?

Demand is subdued for April-May, so passing on price is hard - if industry attempts X, I'd be happy if it gets half. Cost has gone up at least INR25 a bag; only way is focus on own cost. Internal factor more important than external. Herculean task to estimate EBITDA per tonne now - INR4,500 peaks out, then comes down. Next 2-3 quarters we'll keep you posted. Karan: Cost roughly INR250 reduction this year and another INR250 next year - minimum INR500 cumulatively.

Rahul Gupta · Morgan Stanleyweak

With INR500 cumulative cost improvement over the next 2 years, are we shying away from the earlier INR3,650 target? Also is the 15 MT of debottlenecking still on, and what was FY26 brand/advertising cost?

We are not shying away from the target - INR500 is what we can commit right now for the next 2 years. We have the runway to go to the earlier INR3,650. 15 MT debottlenecking still continues - just timing differs based on max return. Vinod: FY26 brand/advertising was closer to INR70 a tonne on full year basis.

Other Q&A (12)
Raashi Chopra · Citi

Current clinker capacity? Q4 average cost vs full-year? And given INR400-500 industry cost inflation, should we expect INR200-250 incremental costs to be offset by fly ash/green energy savings?

Clinker capacity as of now is 69 million tonnes; adding 4 million at Maratha this year. Quarter cost is normalized INR4,250 plus INR250 of escalation = INR4,500 a tonne for March quarter. INR4,500 is the peak, with plus/minus INR50 aberration. If nothing increases further globally, you will see a decline of at least INR150 to INR200. Industry pricing only modestly improved INR10 (INR15-20 in select pockets). FY26 capex INR7,500 crores; FY27 estimate INR6,000-6,500 crores.

Indrajit Agarwal · CLSA

Realization moved only modestly Q-o-Q vs peers up 1.5-2%. Is this mix? And given 71-72% blended utilization on expanded capacity, do we not need additional capacity in FY28 - is that driving calibrated capex?

Vinod: Price sustained at INR254 per bag, modestly up INR1 from December, journey for higher blended/premium has just begun. Karan: We know where the gaps are - certain capacity is in wrong places. We'll add capacity in markets with high share and recall value to reduce logistics cost and improve penetration. Apart from Rajasthan and Maharashtra, won limestone in Assam (new territory, starting maybe end of this year) and Mundra (new clinker line). Inorganic - we keep evaluating, but focus is squarely organic development and greenfield expansion.

Jashandeep Singh Chadha · Nomura

Why is Ambuja's fixed cost (employee + other) up significantly Y-o-Y vs peers? Why planned shutdowns in volume-push Q3 and Q4 rather than monsoon? Target utilization for Sanghi/Orient/Penna in FY27, and is more capex needed to upgrade acquired assets?

Higher branding/advertisement to promote trade and premium; higher R&M (some unplanned breakdowns at Penna). Heat consumption 35-40 kilocalories above target. Ex acquired assets, EBITDA per ton would be INR70-80 higher (closer to INR800+). FY27 utilization targets: Orient at full capacity, Sanghi 65-70%, Penna 55-60%, Ambuja+ACC 75-80%, consol blended 70-75%. Disciplined capex - first commission the existing 10 million in hand, then highlight new program. Mundra is in pipeline.

Prateek Kumar · Jefferies

Reconciling cost: Q3 commentary said INR4,000 January / INR4,100 exit; how is quarter cost INR4,500? Also ACC operating cash flows are sharply negative and consol working capital was negatively impacted - explanation?

ACC has receivable from Ambuja under the MSA - shareholders approved ICD wherein receivables get paid off, so this will get knocked off next quarter. On Ambuja standalone, inventory is higher but receivables are well-controlled with higher trade share. On cost: anticipations didn't work out for acquired assets; packing bag situation came up. Hit INR4,100 for the month of March (normalized) but West Asia war added INR250 escalation. Peak is here, will taper down with passing quarters.

Ritesh Shah · Investec

What prompted the reset right now? What are the 5 key monitorables for the next year? And how does SLA fit in after the reset?

Why reset - our performance has not been great; haven't delivered what we promised. 5 focus areas: (1) L1 plants delivering to respective markets discipline, (2) trade vs non-trade discipline, (3) raw material consumption + electricity/energy reduction, (4) channel network, (5) ~80% of effort tied to cost. Until we deliver, no point in more capital investment. SLA is part of these initiatives - enough competent partners in India; helps clean up legacy union issues at ACC; reduces cost and improves efficiency.

Ashish Jain · Macquarie

Can you break down the INR6,500-7,000 crore annual capex over the next 2 years - growth versus cost efficiency versus other?

Roughly INR4 billion is capex already under execution - includes capacity, WHRS and fly ash transportation. Balance is debottlenecking plus maintenance capex.

Amit Murarka · Axis Capital

When Adani acquired these assets, there was an ambition to become industry leader and double capacity. Current guidance seems subdued - is there a reset in strategic ambition, and what's the target IRR for new capex?

Honestly yes, partially there is a reset. We are not moving away from the target - we are moving away from the timeline. We are not delivering what we committed, so it makes sense to step back, course correct, and reset capacity enhancement plans and time frame. Project IRR has to be 18% - this is all equity money, so equity return like anyone else.

Rajesh Ravi · HDFC Securities

The INR250 reduction guidance for FY27 - is it net off the INR250-300 cost inflation already in place, so net-net flat or up? And core working capital fell 30→20 days but non-core ex-cash jumped from 40 to 49 days - reason?

INR4,500 is the peak; INR250 reduction is from here - so INR4,250 target for FY27. Q1FY27 could be flattish (around INR4,500); then tapers. For the year, INR250 reduction is on full-year average. On non-core working capital - some is incentive booking moving to actual receipt basis to avoid pending long-term accruals; some is accounting working capital - can discuss specifics offline. Core working capital efficiency will continue. New clinker assets: Maratha 4 MT, Mundra 2 MT, Assam 2 MT - 24 to 28 months out.

Shravan Shah · Dolat Capital

Is the INR250 cost reduction on full-year FY27 average? And current April prices vs March? Also full-year FY26 RMX EBITDA?

Yes - INR250 is full-year FY27 average. June quarter is flat from March quarter, so acceleration has to be more for the rest 3 quarters. April pricing up around INR10 vs March. Full-year FY26 RMX EBITDA is around INR300 crores.

Raghav Maheshwari · Equirus Securities

Capex is continuously getting delayed - Maratha plant, Chhattisgarh - despite Adani's pro-capex reputation. What is the underlying issue, and why repeated breakdowns at bigger plants?

Capex has not been up to the mark - that's why we're pausing and correcting. Reasons: (1) did not choose the right contractor for execution, (2) started projects when we acquired Ambuja/ACC with no team in place - took time to build team, (3) projects started without full engineering being done - using next 6 months to complete engineering for new projects. Confident we'll complete in given timeline now. Breakdowns predominantly in acquired assets (Penna, Sanghi) - higher R&M this year because earlier maintenance was not done.

Harsh Mittal · Emkay Global

Current price gap between Ambuja base and premium product, and how does Ambuja's price compare to nearest competitor?

Gap between base and premium product - INR50-55 for super premium, INR20-25 for premium. On competition - pan-India players prices are more or less in similar range in a few districts (INR5-10 here and there, either higher or lower). Reflected in NSP of the quarter, close for number 1 and number 2.

Satyadeep Jain · AMBIT Capital

On recalibrating capacities being in 'right location' - where were they initially, and where are you moving them?

Recalibration is happening because logistics cost is high - integrated units are traveling too far. Shutting down grinding units in some locations and moving them closer to market. Sanghi predominantly clinker plus cement - moving toward predominantly clinker in next 3 years; new capacities coming up on coastal Gujarat (Dahej Line 2 is example - Sanghi supplies clinker, cement supplied from coastal grinder). Recalibration is majority in North UP/Bihar region and Southern Gujarat/Maharashtra. Both ACC and Ambuja - e.g. Bihar market served from Chhattisgarh sub-optimally; will set up Bihar grinding units and keep Chhattisgarh as clinker only.

Prepared remarks (5 blocks)
Yes. Thank you, Deepak. Thanks, Dharmesh. Good evening, everyone. FY '26 was a year of resilience for the Indian cement sector marked by industry consolidation and the GST 2.0 reforms on one side, while the adverse and the extended weather conditions, global geopolitical factors and the various state elections also affected the industry and demand in some or the other way. Against this backdrop, Ambuja delivered a resilient performance for the year, achieving its highest ever annual sales volume of <strong>73.7 million</strong> tonnes, up 16% Y-on-Y, year-on-year in that manner. And on a normalized basis, the EBITDA of INR6,539 crores, up 31% at INR887 per metric ton, which is on a PMT basis, up 12% and the PAT of INR2,647 crores, up 17%. The company continues to remain debt-free and with highest credit rating. Annual volumes grew well ahead of the industry. Trade sales volume grew steady at 10%, while the premium cement accounted for 35% of the trade sales during the year, reflecting sustained progress on premiumization.
During the year, company's cement capacity increased to <strong>109 million</strong> tonnes, supported by commissioning of 10.7 million tonnes of new grinding capacity at various locations like Marwar, Farakka, Sankrail, Sindri, Krishnapatnam and the additional clinker capacity of 7 million tonnes at Jodhpur and Bhatapara. During financial year '26, we also made meaningful progress on the portfolio integration. Successful amalgamation of Sanghi Industries and Penna Cement with Ambuja Cements is now completed, while ACC and Orient Cement is under process.
The One Cement platform is a strategic initiative and will help to bring sharper focus on the operational performance, business synergies and the overall higher degree of compliances. Therefore, this time, the balance sheet of Ambuja consol now has finalized purchase price allocation of Orient and Penna. Till December, it was on a provisional basis. My green power share increased almost 32% now in Q4 compared to 26% before. The newly acquired assets, particularly Sanghi and Penna, they witnessed lower utilization levels. Sanghi still remains at around, say, at 57% on cement capacity utilization, while Penna is 46%. However, last time I mentioned to you that in December quarter, we have seen a good improvement, especially for Sanghi.
The turnaround initiatives have taken a little longer than the expected time lines. And some of these plants, especially of Penna, needed higher than expected time for maintenance capex and overall upkeep of the assets. So on a cost front, we have seen a bit of higher cost compared to our own expectations and therefore, some disappointments. I have mentioned earlier about our journey to achieve cost of almost INR4,000 a tonne by March '26 exit. Meanwhile, in terms of the full year of '26, we have given a figure -- we have achieved a figure of INR4,400 a tonne, which is almost 10% higher to our own target for the reasons which I have mentioned before. Although in the month of March, we are closer to INR4,100 a tonne.
On our overall consol volumes, we are expecting it to grow in FY '28 -- '27 by almost, say, 8% to around 80 million-odd tonnes. And we are cognizant of the fact that we will focus on value with trade volumes and premium cement. And therefore, we are keeping it till moderate overall, say, growth in the volumes part. At an industry level, we believe that given the headlines of inflation and weak monsoon, the industry may grow at around, say, 5% to 5.5%. We continue to remain committed to our end-state sales volumes targeted, supported by a sharper focus on higher utilization of the existing capacities and while operationalizing the new capacities and stabilizing them.
Watch next