Q1FY27 record PAT INR4,867cr (+47% YoY).
- Scope inr 65 billion — question deflected.
- Other equipment orders other — question deflected.
- Operations plf ebitda expectations — answer hedged.
The company has given an order of about INR 65 billion to BHEL. What does it exactly entail given that all our equipments are already being tied up for the upcoming capacities?
There is huge demand of 80 GW of the thermal base power load and by 2032, this will increase from 80 GW to 95 GW, which is what we expect. We are currently in the evaluation phase, exploring various opportunities for expansion. All the plans are ramped up and aligned with our strategic goal. We will share all the updates with concrete numbers in due course of time.
Apart from this, have you given any other order to any other player related to the equipment?
As I said, we are currently evaluating all the options available and we are evaluating these numbers, units, growth requirements in the country and how it will work out, and then definitely we will come up with all these numbers.
On the recently acquired Coastal, Lanco and Vidarbha assets - how have the operations been? Are you facing any challenges? What is the PLF? And for these three acquired assets, what is the EBITDA we can expect?
Lanco Amarkantak has very few challenges except a small ash disposal issue being addressed. Coastal Energen had one unit fully overhauled and the second unit overhaul will be done this month, after which it will be at par with any other power station. Vidarbha was in shutdown since 2018 but advance planning during the NCLT process means the machines are now properly overhauled and good to give normal availability. So there are no further challenges across the three acquired plants.
With the recent ruling on FGD, does that change our CAPEX estimates outlook for the under-construction project?
After this notification, power stations under planning and execution where FGD execution has not started do not need FGD now, so we will drop that expenditure. At Mahan and Raipur, where FGDs are in advanced stage of execution, we will continue. To that extent project cost will go down, but it would not be appropriate to discuss the project numbers in detail or the bifurcation.
What is the revenue and EBITDA guidance for FY26?
We have not provided any specific guidance for revenue or EBITDA. Revenue is variable because tariffs are linked to imported coal prices. Our current business model and tie-up structure give us very stable revenues and EBITDA margin, so till the time our capacity expansion takes place, you can expect similar EBITDA margins as we recorded in the last year.
What is the status of pending validations and final settlement of alternate coal compensation from Haryana discom and by when can we expect closure?
Discussion is still ongoing. Haryana is making payment of 50% of the difference of bills which we are raising, and we are also accounting only for 50% of the amounts. Discussions are going on and we expect that the issue should get resolved soon.
What is the current total of regulatory receivables outstanding and what proportion is under dispute and what is in the process of realization?
There is hardly anything substantial pending now, except for small regulatory changes coming frequently which we may raise in regular course. There is no claim now pending which can change the revenue or profitability substantially.
Are there any other PPAs that could be signed in the near-term in the pipeline for our other upcoming projects?
We have already elaborated that the tenders of Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, Bihar, Madhya Pradesh are under progress. As soon as these bids are finalized, we hope that we should be in a better position to win these bids and consequently sign the PPAs.
What was the merchant realization in the 1st Quarter and merchant outlook for this year?
Our merchant realization for 1st Quarter was Rs.6.51 per kWh as against last year's same quarter, it was Rs.7.60. Khyalia added that merchant rates in Q1 FY26 were lower because monsoon came in May with weather disturbances in April, making April-May-June power demand sluggish. Since monsoon came early it should also end early, so Q2 demand and merchant rates should pick up and be better than last year.
On the upcoming tenders in Bihar, Rajasthan, MP, Uttarakhand - which of these tenders have the requirement where the plant needs to be set up in the same state?
In Bihar, Rajasthan, and MP, the tender condition requires the project to be constructed in the respective state. For Uttarakhand, the project location is not specified, so the project can be anywhere in India.
What was the PLF for Godda during this quarter?
During the quarter, the PLF for Godda was 73%.
We have repaid Rs.2,580-odd crores of unsecured perpetual securities towards principal. Any distribution that has been made in the first Quarter over and above this amount?
Rs.2,579 crores was paid in principal. Apart from that, we also paid Rs.1,146 crores as distribution. Now, we have only Rs.478 crores pending as of 30th June, which we have paid in July. There is no pending so far as perpetual security is concerned.
Any further distribution made in July along with this or now it is almost done?
In July, we have paid balance amount of Rs.478 crores along with distribution. So, there is no outstanding including distribution. Nil.
Any target commissioning date for the Dhirauli mine, which is supposed to be in this year?
The production should start by September or October, somewhere. So, we are on time as per the plan which we gave earlier.
On the recently signed PPA with UPPCL - what was the tariff of that PPA?
We have signed the PPA with UPPCL where the capacity charge is 3.73 and the total tariff is 5.39.
The PPA was for 1,500 MW but capacity is 1,600 MW - are we looking to tie up the remaining 100 MW for merchant or PPA?
No, that is the net capacity of the plant. When we say 1,500 MW, that is after auxiliary consumption. So, there is nothing left out.
About Rs.6,000 to 7,000 crores of debt has increased this quarter for the existing entities while it has remained the same for the under-construction projects. What is the purpose of this debt?
On annual basis, our FFO is more than Rs.21,000 crores and in the next five years, it will be more than Rs.1 lakh crore. Our CAPEX program is also of that amount in aggregate, so we will generate sufficient cash flow to meet CAPEX requirements. Recently we took some interim bridge funding from banks only to meet interim capital expenditure requirements.
What can we expect the debt profile to look like going forward for the rest of the year? Are we expecting to take any further debt for the under-construction projects?
As of now, what we are anticipating is that our internal accruals will be sufficient to meet our CAPEX requirement for the year.